[Thanks to Dancendancen.com for the image.]
History has shown unequivocally that you don't want to monkey with money and credit.
This is the cogent warning
recently issued by Doug Noland at Prudent Bear. He is referring to the monetary shenanigans of the central banks around the world, the most egregious of which is our very own central bank, the Federal Reserve.
After more than 15 years of almost continuous and increasingly profligate money-credit creation, the Fed is now approaching the moment of truth. In the next few months it will have to put its actions where its mouth is regarding the interest rates under its control.
Up to now, Fed Chairman Janet Yellen has been very good at what we could call the Open-Market Charade. While sounding profoundly straightforward and direct, she actually has bested Alan Greenspan at the art of Fedspeak: talking in soothingly erudite phrases, all the while saying nothing in particular.
But no matter what she says now, the Fed's predicament is clear: It must soon choose between allowing the target rate to climb, which will squeeze the necks of already precarious emerging markets, or keeping the rate low and in the process risking re-devaluation of the dollar and/or blowing even more bubbles in stocks, junk bonds, global derivatives, emerging market currencies, and selected real estate.
The inflated bubbles are right in front of our noses. For example, some condos in the West Los Angeles area have now re-attained their all time highs of 2007, and bankrupt ski resort developments have pulled the shovels out of the trash heap and are at it again. And by the way, that price inflation you're looking for? It's already in the high cost of meat, sugar, poultry and eggs, which have climbed 8.3 percent this year, and in dairy that has climbed 5.6 percent. [Source
] Butter has doubled since mid-2013. [Source
The moment the Fed governors choose the former, i.e. increasing the rates, the music will stop and everyone will head for a chair. Usually in this game there is only one empty chair and hence only one loser, but this time there are far fewer chairs and far too many players. If the music stops watch carefully what will happen to countries like Argentina and Russia. Then watch what will happen to the derivatives and other more speculative markets as investors scramble for seats.
For more on the possibilities under this scenario, see this Investopedia.com article
about the carry trade, also heavily involved in the derivatives market; see also this David Wessel article
about a possible global financial crisis due to a rising dollar.
On the other hand, if the Fed chooses the latter route and delays rate normalization, it may succeed in holding off the moment of truth for a few more months while the music continues and stock market speculators continue their merry dance. At the same time, America's fixed-income recipients will have no choice but to reach for their handkerchiefs again to mourn a further loss of purchasing power. (Already in 2012, the SeniorsLeague.org reported
that seniors have lost 34 percent of their purchasing power since 2000.)
The old and the weak are always the first losers during the exaggerated business cycles caused by fiat-money monetary interference, and Oh My, what enormous and distorted cycles they have become. (See this study
from the American Institute for Economic Research on the changing nature of business cycles.) Who are the winners? Debtors, and speculators most of whom are debtors. The biggest debtors of all are governments and financial institutions-who just happen to be co-appointers of their accomplice Fed governors.
What artifice makes this game possible? It is the fiat nature of global currencies. (Read Steve Forbes's latest book
for more on this.) What is the solution? We must elect politicians who will free gold from its tax shackles. What shackles?
An act of Congress in 1974 and a legal decision in 1977 already permit the holding of and transacting in gold. (See the text of the 1974 law here
and a discussion of the court case
permitting gold clauses in contracts.) The only thing preventing gold from playing its traditional role as money is the fact that all gold transactions are taxed, whether it be through sales taxes or capital gains taxes.
Why are they taxed? Because back in the 1970's Congress classified gold as a commodity, kind of like copper or wheat. Why did Congress do this? Because the crafty politicians knew that by doing so the commodity-taxation protocol would immediately take the gold-as-money option off the table. This is what forces us all to accept unsafe fiat "money" instead of the real thing.
Without that handicap, we would not accept it unilaterally. Remove the taxation and gold would become money again. It would find its true exchange rate relative to all currencies (which today would probably be higher than its current $1,200 an ounce). Soon enough, someone would set up a system of international exchange based on gold. The metal would find itself at the center of a new worldwide system of exchange and value storage. Such a system would be much more solid and much more widely accepted than Bitcoin or other alternatives. Call it Bitgold, maybe? And by the way, reinstatement of a proper gold standard is probably not even necessary. Let the markets work out the particulars.
This is not just fanciful thinking. States such as Arizona, Texas, and Utah are discussing the use of gold
as legal tender. Highly stable gold would eventually replace highly unstable fiat money, and trillions of dollars and yen and euros, currently wasted on chasing a quick profit and fulfilling the dreams of politicians (and causing worldwide recessions), would be turned back to their rightful purposes: fomenting enterprise, creating jobs, and raising standards of living across the globe. And most important, this new gold-based monetary system would deprive our central money manipulators of the world's most corrupting, devastating, unconstitutional, and destructive monopoly power.
Labels: Federal Reserve, fiat money, gold, gold standard, inflating